Another Alternative
Energy Inventor Killed?
By Benjamin Fulford
9-3-8

 

A man by the name of Stefan Nystrom invented a way to generate energy from ocean waves that he claims would cost 5% of what coal energy does. He set up a proto-type in Ghana and, initially, claims to have found many potential investors. However, suddenly problems started to pop up. The investors, originally extremely enthusiastic, started to back off. He was offered bribes in order to quit. Finally, he began to be harassed by Ghanaian police and mercenaries. He contacted me in hopes of getting protection. I told him to come to Japan. He told me he was not allowed to leave the country. He said they had taken parts from his prototype. I said I would see what I could do. Before I could do anything, yesterday I received a disturbing set of phone calls from a very scared sounding Mr. Nystrom. "They tried to kill me three times today," he screamed into the phone. Then I lost contact with him, and his phone has been switched off. In his last call, he asked me to make his technology public. So, here below is a description of his technology. Would people please pass it on and would as many people, in a tribute to a man who has probably been killed by mercenaries hired by the oil industry, and make sure that prototypes are developed. The Wavereaper Technology Benjamin Fulford

Remembering the Children

And a call for the dismissal of the New York Times medical editorial team

 International Medical Veritas Association

     Ten years ago, a clinical research paper by Dr. Andrew Wakefield and his team triggered widespread and persistent fears that a combined vaccine that prevents measles, mumps and rubella - the so-called MMR vaccine - causes autism in young children. That theory is sound and represents medical common sense that indicates it is not a good idea to inject noxious substances into children.

      But the study, reported the New York Times this morning in an editorial, "has been soundly refuted by a variety of other research over the years, and now a new study that tried to replicate the original study has provided further evidence that it was a false alarm," or so the Times would have us believe. Just the mention of the word research printed by the Times is supposed to put parents on the defensive because science is now against them but nothing could be further from the truth.

Children are given 25 vaccines by the age of 15 months. But many
 are for diseases that are extremely rare - and which they're naturally
 immune to. As the doctor who challenged MMR fights for his career,
 the author of a new book asks if other jabs are worth the risk.
                                                                             Dr. Richard Halvorsen

     It's now 30 vaccines! The initial paper by Dr. Wakefield was published in The Lancet, the restigious British medical journal, which drew an inferential link between the vaccines, the gastrointestinal problems found in many autistic children and autism. In later papers, researchers theorized that the measles part of the vaccine caused inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract that allowed toxins to enter the body and damage the central nervous system, causing autism. This made sense back then and still does to this day despite the recent research coming from Columbia University, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which have tried and failed to replicate the earlier findings. 

The pediatrician whom I so respected and adored broke down
 and cried when I gave her the news that my daughter had died.
She went back and forth defending the vaccine that she was told was safe,
but blamed it for killing my child.  She then told me that she also had
 another patient, an infant boy, die after this same vaccination.
                                                                               Christine Colebeck

     The New York Times is not impartial and shows its ignorance of the conflicts of interest that lie at the heart of the CDC and everyone connected with it. The Times trusts the CDC more than any other branch of the government, for some unseen reason, meaning it totally backs the poisoning of our young children with deadly chemicals like thimerosal, which are still present in childhood vaccines.

     Problems with one type of vaccine cast shadows on other vaccines for they can all be lumped together and marked with the skull and cross bones signal warning everyone of their danger. The dentists receive the mercury that they will put in your mouth this way, with the cross and bones but they hide it in the drawer. The greatest disaster in medicine and dentistry over the past 100 years is their use of mercury. The entire question of thimerosal (fifty percent by weight ethyl-mercury) in vaccines has totally compromised the pediatric profession. 

Would you allow someone you don't know to inject
something you don't know into your, your child's body?

     When medical science abandons safe medical practices for highly dangerous ones we have a serious situation that we need to look at under a microscope. When the law protects organizations, people and corporations that inject mercury containing vaccines into newborn infants and children in the first years of life, a substance that burns their brain, sometimes kills, or more frequently causes autism and many other neurological disorders, we have a huge catastrophic problem that casts a serious doubt on the sanity of those involved. Recently Dr. King reminded us of all the vaccines that still contain thimerosal and it's a shocker. 

Thimerosal is one of the most toxic compounds I know of,
 I can't think of anything that I know of is more lethal.
                                                                     Dr. Boyd Haley 
                                                                                                   Chemistry Department Kentucky U.

     The Times says that the new study adds weight to a growing body of epidemiological studies and reviews that have debunked the notion that childhood vaccines cause autism. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences, the C.D.C. and the World Health Organization have found no evidence of a causal link between vaccines and autism and parents are supposed to trust these organizations and put their children in harms way, according to the Times.

"I can assure you that death from vaccination is neither quick nor painless.
 I helplessly watched my daughter suffer an excruciatingly slow death
 as she screamed and arched her back in pain, while the vaccine
 did as it was intended to do and assaulted her immature immune system.
 The poisons used as preservatives seeped through her tiny body,
 overwhelming her vital organs one by one until they collapsed.
 It is an image that will haunt me forever
 and I hope no other parent ever has to witness it.
A death sentence considered too inhumane for
 this county's most violent criminals was handed down to my
 beautiful, innocent, infant daughter, death by lethal injection."
                                                                          Christine Colebeck
                                                   whose daughter died twenty-four hours
                                                    after receiving DPT OPV vaccinations

      The Times thinks it's sad that even after all of this, many parents of autistic children still blame the vaccine. The Times feels that the big losers in this debate are the children who are not being vaccinated because of parental fears and are at risk of contracting serious, sometimes fatal, diseases. The reality and real fear should come from seeing that vaccines do in absolute fact cause serious disturbances in more children then the CDC or Times will honestly admit to. The New York Times is not counting the vaccine dead or the vaccine injured and this is more than sad - it is tragic. 

     A new study claims that almost double the number of children could have autism as previously thought. An unpublished piece of research by Cambridge University's Autism Research Centre (ARC) found that as many as one in 58 children could suffer from the condition, which can affect speech, understanding and communication. The ARC's study is one of the largest to date, being based on the incidence of autism in 12,000 primary school children in Cambridgeshire between 2001 and 2004.

I am now convinced that rather than being a silver bullet
 in the heart of disease, vaccine programmes could actually
 be causing some serious health problems, with hundreds
 if not thousands of children adversely affected every year.
The more I researched, the more disturbed I became.
 I felt I'd been grossly misled by the Department of Health.
                                                                                  Dr. Richard Halvorsen

     Two of the seven experts who contributed towards the study, Dr Fiona Scott and Dr Carol Stott, are reported to have said in private that they thought the high figure could be linked to the use of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Dr Scott denied this was the case but said, "My position is and always has been that if there are children who have been damaged by the MMR vaccine it is the same proportion of children who have been damaged by other vaccines." She did say though, that the MMR jab could cause a form a brain damage similar to autism in a "very, very small number of children."

      This sounds strange from someone whose study in England is showing the most alarming rates of neurological damage in children. If one included statistics for other damages then one would see the nightmare facing parents and the future of humanity. Clearly the vaccine dead are in the minority with upward of 25 percent of our young facing neurological struggles.

     Antibiotics are thrown on top of the neurological fires started by vaccines and this is like stepping on the face of a drowning man coming up for air. Once damage is done it is covered by layers of additional damage caused by the medical response to the initial vaccine insult. All too often the pharmaceutical companies hit the grand slam when striking the newborn and realizing a birth to death dependency on their products. This is the ultimate wet dream of pharmaceutical executives and one will not find anyone who owns any pharmaceutical stocks complaining about it. Sadly the dentists add to this mixture placing toxic waste sites inches from kids' brains in the form of dental amalgam and what is even sadder is that they still have no intention of stopping - neither doctor nor dentist wants to let go of their dependency on mercury.

      All of us who live in the system and abide by its rules are tarnished by our participation and few of us can see anyway out of the black hole of corporate capitalism that sits so proudly as a banner behind the pharmaceutical companies and the medical organizations that supports them. What can you say about a society that attacks the young except you hope it eventually fails?   

                              
I think it's absolutely criminal to give mercury to an infant.
                                                                                                               Dr.Boyd Haley
                                                                                                                        University of Kentucky

     The childhood vaccine program is a danger to our children and parents should not trust the Times or any other governmental or medical organization. There are no terrorist organizations in the world who can stand up to the Times in sophistication. Where other terrorist organizations use guns and bullets the Times uses words and science and medical research as weapons of mass destruction with it all aimed at parents and their precious children. The real science though stands behind the parents with 358 didactic scientific papers with the association of mercury to chronic heart; with cancer we find 643 scientific papers. The association of mercury with neurodegenerative diseases is the most significant, with the references numbering 1,445.

     Pediatric medicine and dentistry have created such a mess of things that we have no idea what the health of the entire baby boom generation and now newer generations would be like if they had not been massively poisoned with mercury. Mercury toxicity is simply ignored by dentists and doctors alike and the government does not care how many tons come out of industrial smoke stacks.

The majority of flu shots given children still contain 25 micrograms
 of mercury, an amount considered unsafe under government
 agency guidelines for anyone weighing less than 550 lbs.

      I am talking about Shaken Baby Syndrome. A situation where parents are innocently taking their babies to doctors' offices where the babies are subjected to multiple vaccines with toxic amounts of chemicals and biological products injected directly into their blood streams. Listening to the doctors and medical examiners jumping down parents throats with accusations that cover up their own wrongdoings insults the very meaning of medicine and I know of doctors who are ashamed of being one for this very reason.

     It is correct to assume that vaccines are dangerous and that the people and organizations that support them are not to be trusted. This is a logical conclusion to come to if one bothers to look at even a small fraction of the facts. What it really comes down to in medical science is this. There are the facts and then there are the studies. In today's world of medicine the studies betray the facts.  Thus the pharmaceutical companies are able to continue their rein of terror, which has only grown more pronounced in the sixty years since they were forced to shut down their medical experiments in their own privately funded concentration camps in Nazi Germany. The Times would hide this fact of history or claim it has nothing to do with what they published today in their paper. 

     People have no idea about the subject of terrorism and the capacity of humans to do harm to each other. The New York Times medical staff is demonstrating for us one of the most deadly forms of terrorism. Its intellectual snobbery taken up to a level that is demeaning to our sense of humanity. It's a direct attack on the intelligence of parents and for this they should be summarily dismissed from their posts.

Mark Sircus Ac., OMD
Director International Medical Veritas Association
http://www.winningcancer.com/