LATEST SUMMARIES
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT LAW, TRANSPORTATION
Huntleigh USA Corp. v. US
You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must
sign in to FindLaw.com.
LATEST SUMMARIES
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT LAW, TRANSPORTATION
Huntleigh USA Corp. v. US, No. 2007-5118
In a company's action against the government alleging, inter alia,
that the Aviation and Transportation Security Act's (ATSA) transfer
of responsibility for passenger and baggage screening resulted in an
unconstitutional taking of its property without just compensation, a
judgment against plaintiff is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff could not
claim a taking since the ATSA did not regulate plaintiff directly
but merely "frustrated" plaintiff's business expectations by
reducing the demand for plaintiff's services; and 2) plaintiff was
not entitled to compensation under ATSA section 101(g)(2) since it
gives the government the power to assume the contracts but does not
require it to do so.
Read more...