password
username
Sponsored by CakeMail, an email marketing software.
Newsletter preview

 


May 15, 2008

Table of Contents

LATEST SUMMARIES

AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT LAW, TRANSPORTATION
• Huntleigh USA Corp. v. US

You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com.

LATEST SUMMARIES

AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT LAW, TRANSPORTATION
Huntleigh USA Corp. v. US, No. 2007-5118
In a company's action against the government alleging, inter alia, that the Aviation and Transportation Security Act's (ATSA) transfer of responsibility for passenger and baggage screening resulted in an unconstitutional taking of its property without just compensation, a judgment against plaintiff is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff could not claim a taking since the ATSA did not regulate plaintiff directly but merely "frustrated" plaintiff's business expectations by reducing the demand for plaintiff's services; and 2) plaintiff was not entitled to compensation under ATSA section 101(g)(2) since it gives the government the power to assume the contracts but does not require it to do so. Read more...


 You are currently subscribed to fed-caselaw as: kallyorama@gmail.com .
To manage your newsletter accounts go to: http://newsletters.findlaw.com/nl/sub/review-account.jsp
or to ***, send a blank email to leave-3740542-1395333.ec4e5fe2ff8da97a5c0d69a0dac019e5@info.legalminds.org