LATEST SUMMARIES
CIVIL RIGHTS, CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT LAW, MANUFACTURING, TAX LAW
S&M Brands, Inc. v. Cooper
GOVERNMENT LAW, HEALTH LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW
U.S. ex rel Marlar v. BWXT Y-12, LLC
IMMIGRATION LAW
Ukpabi v. Mukasey
You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must
sign in to FindLaw.com.
LATEST SUMMARIES
CIVIL RIGHTS, CONTRACTS, GOVERNMENT LAW, MANUFACTURING, TAX LAW
S&M Brands, Inc. v. Cooper, No. 06-5828, 06-5829
In an action involving the Tennessee's Attorney General's
enforcement of an amended escrow provision in the Master Settlement
Agreement between various states and tobacco manufacturers alleging
an impermissible retroactive effect in violation of due process, a
summary judgment ruling is reversed and remanded with instructions
to dismiss the case without prejudice on grounds of sovereign
immunity where: 1) continuous application of the retroactive statute
is unlikely; 2) states enjoy immunity in federal court for
tax-related claims; 3) the inherent dignity of the sovereign state
favors immunity; and 4) the semi-tax nature of the escrow system
would better lend itself to a suit in state court.
Read more...
GOVERNMENT LAW, HEALTH LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW
U.S. ex rel Marlar v. BWXT Y-12, LLC, No. 07-6051
In an action alleging violation of the the False Claims Act and
discharge in retaliation for whistleblowing, dismissal of the fraud
complaint is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff failed to provide
sufficient detail regarding the procedures used to defraud the
government; and 2) plaintiff failed to allege facts regarding a
false claim presented to the government.
However, dismissal of the retaliation claim is reversed and
remanded where plaintiff provided sufficient information regarding
the retaliatory nature of her discharge.
Read more...
IMMIGRATION LAW
Ukpabi v. Mukasey, No. 06-4028
Denial of a motion for a continuance in a removal proceeding is
affirmed where: 1) there was no evidence that an IJ abused her
discretion in denying the motion; 2) there was no violation of
international law; and 3) there is no due process right to a
continuance while a pending visa petition is fully adjudicated.
Read more...