LATEST SUMMARIES
CIVIL PROCEDURE, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE, HABEAS CORPUS
Thompson v. Choinski
CIVIL PROCEDURE, IMMIGRATION LAW
Dedji v. Mukasey
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE, SENTENCING
US v. Desinor
You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must
sign in to FindLaw.com.
LATEST SUMMARIES
CIVIL PROCEDURE, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE, HABEAS CORPUS
Thompson v. Choinski, No. 04-5079
Dismissal of a habeas petition is affirmed in part and vacated in
part where: 1) insofar as the petition challenged the conviction, it
was a "second or successive motion" which did not satisfy the
requirements for such a motion under 28 U.S.C. section 2255; 2)
claims protesting conditions of confinement imposed by a state
facility became moot when petitioner was transferred back to a
federal prison; but 3) the district court erroneously dismissed
claims protesting the federally imposed conditions of confinement
based on petitioner's failure to exhaust state remedies and for
other perceived defects in pleading.
Read more...
CIVIL PROCEDURE, IMMIGRATION LAW
Dedji v. Mukasey, No. 05-5414
An IJ has broad discretion, in the management of his docket, to
enforce deadlines established by local rules, and to deviate from
the local rules where: 1) petitioner has demonstrated good cause for
the delay; and 2) substantial prejudice would likely result from the
enforcement of the deadline. Further, abuse of discretion is the
proper standard to apply in reviewing an IJ's decision to establish
and enforce filing deadlines for submission of documents.
Read more...
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE, SENTENCING
US v. Desinor, No. 05-4500, 05-5907, 06-2256
In a prosecution of multiple defendants for various drug-related
offenses, their convictions are affirmed where: 1) defendants were
not entitled to a jury charge on self-defense; 2) there was no error
in a jury charge regarding the nexus between the drug conspiracy and
the murder of a rival gang member; and 3) the evidence was
sufficient to prove the existence of that nexus beyond a reasonable
doubt. However, the sentence of one co-defendant is partially
vacated and remanded where the district court imposed a consecutive
sentence on that defendant for discharging a firearm without making
the requisite finding of discharge.
Read more...