password
username
Sponsored by CakeMail, an email marketing software.
Newsletter preview


ETC Group
News Release
29 April 2008
www.etcgroup.org

Hollow Victory: Enola Bean Patent Smashed At Last (Maybe)

The infamous Enola bean patent, first denounced by ETC Group eight
years ago as a textbook case of biopiracy, was struck down yesterday
(April 29, 2008) by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office in Washington,
D.C. One of the most controversial plant patents in history, the
effort to defeat it was unprecedented because it involved the United
Nations and international plant breeding institutes.

"Many people are calling the PTO's decision to reject the Enola bean
patent a victory, but we're inclined to call it a travesty," said Hope
Shand of ETC Group. "In essence, the U.S. patent system allowed the
owner of a flagrantly unjust patent to legally monopolize markets and
destroy competition - for close to half the 20-year patent term. And
even now the patent owner could still appeal through the federal court
system!"

"Worse still, Mexican and U.S. farmers who suffered damages as a
result of this unjust monopoly will never be compensated for their
losses. Patent law has no mechanism to compensate farmers and
indigenous peoples who are victimized by predatory patent abuses,"
adds Silvia Ribeiro of ETC Group's office in Mexico City.

According to ETC Group, the eight-year patent challenge is, above all,
an indictment of the patent system's ability to "correct" patent
abuses. The request for re-examination of the patent was filed in
December 2000. The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office declared its
preliminary rejection of the patent three years later. Using a series
of bureaucratic delays and diversions, the patent owner was allowed to
legally extend his exclusive monopoly on a Mexican bean variety for
over 8 years.

"We've seen protracted patent battles before. It was just last year
that the European Patent Office struck down Monsanto's species-wide
patent on all genetically modified soybeans - but it took an appeal
and 13 years," said Kathy Jo Wetter of ETC Group. "The patent system
is broken on both sides of the Atlantic," she adds.

Background
The Enola bean patent holds a special place in the "biopiracy hall of
shame" because the patented yellow bean was proven to be genetically
identical to an existing Mexican bean variety.(1) That's not
surprising, because the patent owner, Larry Proctor, first got his
hands on the yellow bean when he bought a bag of beans in Mexico.
After securing his monopoly patent, Proctor accused Mexican farmers of
infringing the patent (U.S. patent number 5,894,079) by selling yellow
beans in the U.S. As a result, shipments of yellow beans from Mexico
were stopped at the U.S./Mexican border, and Mexican farmers lost
lucrative markets. In 2001 Proctor filed lawsuits against 16 small
bean seed companies and farmers in the U.S., again charging patent
infringement.

Intergovernmental Patent Challenge
In January 2000 ETC Group (then as RAFI) denounced the Enola bean
patent as "Mexican bean biopiracy" and demanded that the patent be
legally challenged and revoked. ETC Group requested that the Food and
Agriculture Organization and the Consultative Group on International
Agricultural Research (CGIAR) investigate the patent as a violation of
the CGIAR's 1994 Trust agreement that obliges them to keep designated
crop germplasm in the public domain and off-limits to intellectual
property claims.

Agreeing with ETC Group, the Colombia-based International Center for
Tropical Agriculture (CIAT, a CGIAR center), with support from FAO,
filed an official challenge of the predatory Enola bean patent in
Washington, D.C. "We commend CIAT and FAO for taking this action, and
for sticking with the 8-year patent challenge," said Pat Mooney of ETC
Group. "Joachim Voss, CIAT's former director general, deserves special
recognition for leading the patent challenge," notes Mooney.

ETC Group warns that egregious monopoly patent claims on seeds, genes
and traits are by no means a thing of the past. In the midst of a
deepening world food crisis, with climate chaos as the backdrop -
predatory patenting is a greater threat than ever. Please stay tuned.

The Enola Bean Patent Reexamination Saga

13 April 1999: Larry Proctor wins US Patent No. 5,894,079, "field bean
cultivar named enola"
15 January 2000: ETC Group denounces the enola bean patent as
technically invalid and morally unacceptable nla_internal_2731623.jpg December 2000: Request for Reexamination of US patent 5,894,079
(issued 13 April 1999) filed by CIAT http://www.etcgroup.org/article.asp?newsid=96
30 November 2001: Proctor sues 16 small bean seed companies and
farmers in Colorado for infringing his patent http://www.etcgroup.org/article.asp?newsid=282
02 December 2003: USPTO's reexamination results in "Non Final"
Rejection of Patent
02 June 2004: Proctor submits 400+ page amendment to "Non Final"
Rejection
14 April 2005: USPTO issues "Final Rejection" of Patent
14 October 2005: Proctor submits Request for Continued Examination of
Patent
21 December 2005: and issues another "Final Rejection" of Patent http://www.etcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=41
29 April 2008: USPTO's Board of Patent Appeals affirms the patent
examiner's decision regarding the rejection of all standing claims in
the Patent
????? - Will Larry Proctor appeal through the U.S. Federal Court system?


For more information:

Hope Shand and Kathy Jo Wetter, ETC Group (USA) hope@etcgroup.org kjo@etcgroup.org
+1 919 960-5767 (office)

Silvia Ribeiro, ETC Group (Mexico) silvia@etcgroup.org
+52 5555 6326 64

Pat Mooney, ETC Group (Ottawa, Canada) etc@etcgroup.org
+1 613 241-2267

1) L. Pallottini, J. Kami, G. Barcaccia, P. Gepts, The Genetic
Identity of a Patented Yellow Bean, a paper presented at the American
Society of Agronomy Annual Meeting, Denver, November 2-5, 2003. The
official results were published in the May/June 2004 issue of Crop
Science, Pallottini et al., "The Genetic Anatomy of a Patented Yellow
Bean," Crop Science, 44:968-977 (2004).
_______________________________________________
ETC Group mailing list
http://lists.etcgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/etcgroup