LATEST SUMMARIES
ATTORNEY'S FEES, BANKRUPTCY LAW, INJURY AND TORT LAW
Maxwell v. KPMG, LLP
CIVIL PROCEDURE, CIVIL RIGHTS, GOVERNMENT LAW, INJURY AND TORT LAW
Chelios v. Heavener
CIVIL RIGHTS, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW, RETAIL
Abdullahi v. Prada USA Corp.
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE
US v. Fiasche
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SENTENCING
US v. Sanders
HEALTH LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW, WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Dotson v. BRP US Inc.
You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must
sign in to FindLaw.com.
LATEST SUMMARIES
ATTORNEY'S FEES, BANKRUPTCY LAW, INJURY AND TORT LAW
Maxwell v. KPMG, LLP, No. 07-2819
In a suit brought by a Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee alleging that
the bankrupt company was harmed by an accounting firm's breach of
its duty of care, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where:
1) even assuming that defendant was negligent in its statement of
the company's earnings, that statement was not the cause of an
ill-fated business decision entered into by the company; and 2) the
evidence presented did not support the claim for damages.
Defendant is authorized to seek attorney's fees in the district
court.
Read more...
CIVIL PROCEDURE, CIVIL RIGHTS, GOVERNMENT LAW, INJURY AND TORT LAW
Chelios v. Heavener, No. 06-4125
In a suit alleging wrongful arrest, excessive force and battery
against police officers and a city, summary judgment for defendants
is reversed where: 1) there was a genuine issue of material fact
concerning probable cause for the arrest; 2) under plaintiff's
version of the facts, a jury could conclude that officers used
excessive force while arresting him; 3) additional factual
development is required before a determination on qualified immunity
can be made; and 4) a jury should determine whether an officer
engaged in behavior constituting battery.
Read more...
CIVIL RIGHTS, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW, RETAIL
Abdullahi v. Prada USA Corp., No. 07-2489
In a suit against a high-end clothing retailer alleging retaliation
and discrimination, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed in part
and reversed in part where: 1) the failure of a pro se plaintiff to
check the box marked "race" on a standard complaint form did not
preclude her 42 U.S.C. section 1981 claims; and 2) an allegation of
defamation in retaliation for filing a post-termination EEOC
complaint is actionable under Title VII.
Read more...
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE
US v. Fiasche, No. 07-1132
Convictions for conspiracy to possess narcotics with intent to
distribute are affirmed where police officers had reasonable
suspicions that justified a vehicle stop and search, and an
objectively reasonable belief that exigent circumstances justified
entry into a defendant's home.
Read more...
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SENTENCING
US v. Sanders, No. 07-1176
Conviction and sentence on firearms charges are affirmed where: 1)
there was sufficient evidence that defendant knew he possessed a
shotgun shorter than the legal limit; 2) defendant waived his
challenge to jury instructions; 3) the district court properly
understood its discretion at sentencing; and 4) the court gave an
adequate statement of reasons for the sentence.
Read more...
HEALTH LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW, WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Dotson v. BRP US Inc., No. 07-1375
In a suit alleging retaliatory discharge for filing a workers'
compensation claim, summary judgment for defendant-employer is
affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's employer correctly counted his
extended work absence as FMLA leave; 2) under Illinois law, an
employee may be terminated for excessive absenteeism even if the
absence is due to a work-related injury covered by workers'
compensation; and 3) an employer may run FMLA leave concurrently
with workers' compensation with adequate notice, which the defendant
provided.
Read more...