LATEST SUMMARIES
CONTRACTS, INSURANCE LAW
Barth v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE
People v. Hudson
People v. Slater
People v. Bew
People v. Harris
ELECTIONS, GOVERNMENT LAW
Cinkus v. The Vill. of Stickney Mun. Officers Electoral Bd.
FAMILY LAW
In re Marriage of Best
You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must
sign in to FindLaw.com.
FindLaw includes summaries of all Supreme and Appellate Court slip opinions posted on the official Illinois Courts site. FindLaw summaries include opinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawal. Check the Illinois Courts site to determine if a specific opinion has been released before relying on that case as precedent.
LATEST SUMMARIES
CONTRACTS, INSURANCE LAW
Barth v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., No. 104378
In a suit seeking damages after denial of insurance coverage for a
home destroyed by fire, where plaintiff allegedly misrepresented his
financial status, judgment for defendant is affirmed as: 1)
defendant-insurance company need not prove reasonable reliance or
injury under the exclusionary provision at issue because it is
distinguishable from an affirmative defense relying on common law
fraud; and 2) the materiality instruction given was sufficient to
state the correct law to the jury.
Read more...
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE
People v. Hudson, No. 104470
Conviction for home invasion is affirmed over claims that: 1)
psychological injury does not satisfy the "injury" element of the
offense of home invasion; 2) the evidence was insufficient to show
that defendant intended to harm the victim; 3) the evidence was
insufficient to prove that the victim suffered psychological harm;
and 4) the circuit court denied defendant a fair hearing on his
posttrial claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
Read more...
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE
People v. Slater, No. 104095
Conviction for one count of permitting the sexual abuse of a child
is affirmed where an inculpatory statement made by defendant during
a questioning session at the Will County Child Advocacy Center did
not violate Miranda, was made knowingly and voluntarily, and was
properly
admissible at trial, and therefore, a second inculpatory statement
made by defendant thereafter at the sheriff's department could not
be tainted by the properly obtained first statement.
Read more...
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE
People v. Bew, No. 104084
In a conviction for unlawful possession of cannabis with intent to
deliver, an appellate court's finding of ineffective assistance of
counsel and remand for new trial is reversed where: 1) the appellate
court erred in its reliance on Cox, which held police must have an
articulable suspicion before conducting a canine sniff at a traffic
stop; and 2) the record is insufficient to review the alternative
arguments of the parties.
Read more...
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE
People v. Harris, No. 103796
In a conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance
arising from a routine traffic stop of an unlicensed driver with
outstanding warrants, the appellate court's reversal of the
conviction upon remand from the U.S. Supreme Court is reversed and
the conviction affirmed where neither the officer's request that
defendant provide identification nor the subsequent warrant check
using the information obtained from the defendant violated his
rights under the fourth amendment.
Read more...
ELECTIONS, GOVERNMENT LAW
Cinkus v. The Vill. of Stickney Mun. Officers Electoral Bd., No.
104471
In an appeal from a determination that plaintiff was not eligible to
run for public office pursuant to section 3.1–10–5(b) of the
Illinois Municipal Code, determination is affirmed where plaintiff
was in arrears of a debt owed to the village at the time he filed
his nomination papers.
Read more...
FAMILY LAW
In re Marriage of Best, No. 104002
In a dissolution of marriage action, the appellate court's sua
sponte reversal the trial court's declaratory judgment order
addressing the validity and effect of a premarital agreement is
reversed where the second prong of the declaratory judgment statute
was met even though a final dissolution order had not been entered.
Determination that the spousal support and insurance coverage
waivers in the premarital agreement apply only if the parties are
legally separated is affirmed.
Read more...