LATEST SUMMARIES
CONTRACTS, INSURANCE LAW
Panasia Estates, Inc. v. Hudson Ins. Co.
CONTRACTS, INSURANCE LAW, REMEDIES
Bi-Economy Market, Inc. v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of New York
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE
People v. Rawlins
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SENTENCING
People v. Leon
You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must
sign in to FindLaw.com.
LATEST SUMMARIES
CONTRACTS, INSURANCE LAW
Panasia Estates, Inc. v. Hudson Ins. Co., No. 15
In an action alleging breach of insurance contract, denial of part
of defendant's motion to dismiss claims for consquential damages is
affirmed as an insured may recover foreseeable damages, beyond the
limits of its policy, for breach of a duty to investigate, bargain
for and settle claims in good faith.
Read more...
CONTRACTS, INSURANCE LAW, REMEDIES
Bi-Economy Market, Inc. v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of New York, No.
14
In this action by insured against insurer for breach of a commercial
property insurance contract, the insured can assert a claim for
consequential damages.
Read more...
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE
People v. Rawlins, No. 6, 7
DNA and latent fingerprint comparison reports prepared by
nontestifying experts are not "testimonial" statements within the
meaning of Crawford v. Washington 541 U.S. 36 (2004).
Read more...
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SENTENCING
People v. Leon, No. 8
Conviction arising out of sexual abuse of a 13-year-old and
adjudication of defendant as a persistent violent felony offender
upon a finding that defendant had previously been convicted of two
violent felonies are affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1)
Crawford v. Washington applies at a predicate sentencing hearing,
both as a matter of his Sixth Amendment right to be confronted with
the witnesses against him, and by operation of CPL 400.15(7)(a); and
2) in light of his challenge to being the same person identified in
an earlier conviction, the hearing court necessarily made a finding
of fact beyond the sole permissible fact of prior convictions in
violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey.
Read more...