password
username
Sponsored by CakeMail, an email marketing software.
Newsletter preview


July 23-27, 2007

Table of Contents

GOVERNMENT BENEFITS CASES

• Park Manor, Ltd, v. US Dep't of Health and Human Servs.
• Bertrand v. Maram
• England v. Astrue
• Cox v. Astrue

You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com.

U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, July 23, 2007
Park Manor, Ltd, v. US Dep't of Health and Human Servs., No. 06-3521
Petition for review is denied after an agency decision to deny attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act for the challenger in a challenge to sanctions imposed on a nursing home by defendant-agency where: 1) there was substantial justification for charges against petitioner that the agency later dropped; and 2) the petitioner prevailed in the remaining proceedings. Read more...

U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, July 24, 2007
Bertrand v. Maram, No. 06-3705
In a suit challenging Illinois rules for the provision of residential habilitation services, one plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as moot where a purported class was not certified before plaintiff's personal claim became moot. Judgment for defendants is affirmed where a state does not violate federal Medicaid law by using the criteria that formed part of the basis for requesting a waiver for a program in order to determine eligibility. Read more...

U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, July 26, 2007
England v. Astrue, No. 06-3578
Denial of application for Social Security disability benefits is affirmed where: 1) the ALJ's determinations were supported by substantial evidence; 2) the hypothetical posed to the ALJ adequately reflected all of the applicant's limitations; and 3) the ALJ adequately explained why he rejected the applicant's subjective complaints. Read more...

U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, July 26, 2007
Cox v. Astrue, No. 06-3640
Denial of application for Social Security Disability Benefits is affirmed over applicant's argument that, as a result of procedural errors and ambiguous medical evidence, the ALJ's determination that she was not disabled was not premised on substantial evidence. Read more...


You are currently subscribed to govbenifitcase as: kallyorama@gmail.com .
To manage your newsletter accounts go to: http://newsletters.findlaw.com/nl/sub/review-account.jsp
or to ***, send a blank email to leave-1961915-1395353.21d3070b135bfdd1076fa2f8cc14e96a@info.legalminds.org